These notes are made up of nested blocks (i.e. bullet points). You can access a block directly by clicking the arrow on the right side of the block. In theory, this could be a way to link between different people’s notes (i.e. Knowledge Graphs), and have direct access to the block hierarchy in published notes the same way one does in Logseq. Long-term, I hope to use this system to add more semantic meaning to the linked connections between notes, and explore the possible ramifications of surfacing their underlying categorical structure.

These notes are made up of nested blocks (i.e. bullet points). You can access a block directly by clicking the arrow on the right side of the block. In theory, this coulud be a way to link between different people’s notes (i.e. Knowledge Graphs), and have direct access to the block hierarchy in published notes the same way one does in Logseq. Long-term, I hope to use this system to add more semantic meaning to the linked connections between notes, and explore the possible ramifications of surfacing their underlying categorical structure.

This prototypes a possible way to link between different people’s knowledge graphs using the familiar structure of URLs. This relates to the idea of a world knowledge graph, and I discuss it more in my post on how logseq should build a world knowledge graph.

There is a nod here to category theory. I’m not yet sure what to make of it, but I have a desire to make a note-taking language that can essentially be the language of category theory. If ever achieved, then, in theory, anything that can be represented by a Category can be represented as knowledge graph of notes.

There is a nod here to category theory. I’m not yet sure what to make of it, but I have a desire to make a note-taking language that can essentially be the language of category theory. If ever achieved, then, in theory, anything that can be represented by a Category can be represented as knowledge graph of notes.