There is a nod here to category theory. I’m not yet sure what to make of it, but I have a desire to make a note-taking language that can essentially be the language of category theory. If ever achieved, then, in theory, anything that can be represented by a Category can be represented as knowledge graph of notes.

These notes are made up of nested blocks (i.e. bullet points). You can access a block directly by clicking the arrow on the right side of the block. In theory, this could be a way to link between different people’s notes (i.e. Knowledge Graphs), and have direct access to the block hierarchy in published notes the same way one does in Logseq. Long-term, I hope to use this system to add more semantic meaning to the linked connections between notes, and explore the possible ramifications of surfacing their underlying categorical structure.

This prototypes a possible way to link between different people’s knowledge graphs using the familiar structure of URLs. This relates to the idea of a world knowledge graph, and I discuss it more in my post on how logseq should build a world knowledge graph.

There is a nod here to category theory. I’m not yet sure what to make of it, but I have a desire to make a note-taking language that can essentially be the language of category theory. If ever achieved, then, in theory, anything that can be represented by a Category can be represented as knowledge graph of notes.

These notes are made up of nested blocks (i.e. bullet points). You can access a block directly by clicking the arrow on the right side of the block. In theory, this coulud be a way to link between different people’s notes (i.e. Knowledge Graphs), and have direct access to the block hierarchy in published notes the same way one does in Logseq. Long-term, I hope to use this system to add more semantic meaning to the linked connections between notes, and explore the possible ramifications of surfacing their underlying categorical structure.