We acknowledge the true perspective.

Currently, if one seeks ultimate truth, it seems this true perspective must be involved or at least engaged.

For the sake of discussion, everyone seems to take it as an axiom that something matters. I don’t believe I’ve ever seen anyone attempt to push a perspective that is truly agnostic to any outcomes (what I call true perspective). Yet, I haven’t seen this axiom made explicit anywhere (though I probably haven’t looked hard enough).

true perspective is seeing things from a cosmic, universal, time-insensitive point of view. This means not human-centric, earth-centric, or now-centric.

With true perspective, the difference between any two outcomes is of no meaningful difference.

I take it as an axiom that something matters, and avoid the reduction of every argument to a potential true perspective.

The real perspective is not the opposite of the true perspective. The real perspective can include or exclude the true perspective.

This is the perspective we take after we acknowledge the true perspective, but believe that there exists at least one set of outcomes with differences that are meaningful and whose differences “matter”.