better ways we can measure impact (200) {{renderer :wordcount_}}

→

there are a lot of shortcomings to our existing data

→

generally, we don’t want to only use citations to measure success

→

The quality of collaboration is not well identified in existing research, and it might be useful to differentiate between direct supervisors and standard scientific research collaborations (Qi et al, 2017).

→

The difference from field to field, and from research areas within fields.

→

Qi et al’s findings are derived from data from the field of physics, while Li et al mention that they are confidence in their findings, but that deeper research could be done.

→

other shortcomings

→