12:41 →
#
>

unreasonable effectiveness of compositional thinking

→
#
>

maybe ignore the difference between language and thought and just talk about both of them as things that can come out of composition

→
#
>

human language is composition at its core

→
#
>

potential structure

→
#
>

1 should be priming off the intuition between language and composition, perhaps of systems

→
#
>

2 category theory intros

→
#
>

3 the types of categories, logic, groups, enriched, poset, co-design, system dynamics, dsm

→
#
>

Show what a category would look like if it was displayed as a dsm so it would just be a 2 x 2 matrix where the objects are on the columns and the morphisms are dots

→
#
>

compo functo human cognition theory: (putting two things together) + (comparing two things to each other)

→
#
>

first principles of human thought

→
#
>

how would the first thought have occurred? could every subsequent thought be derived from the first thought using these two tools?

→
#
>

From first principles, we translate our first idea to our second idea, and track how they are different

→
#
>

Space-time is like composition thought the two can’t be disconnected from each other

→
#
>

Composition and invariance as the physics of thought

→
#
>

That which changes, and that which stays the same

→
#
>

The difference between identity, morphism, and isomorphism is what determines a category

→
#
>

We claim people are the same person over time, so in that category person has an invariant identity

→
#
>

does consciousness emerge from recursive meta-reflexive structure?

→